Ekaterina Yashina vs Anastasiya Zaparyniuk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Is Yashina stronger on second serve points recently? Yes, Yashina has won 40.24% of points on their second serve, compared to Zaparyniuk's 27.74%.
• How does each player perform on return games? Yashina has been winning 45.38% of the opponent's second serve points, whereas Zaparyniuk leads slightly with 50.82%. On first serve returns, Zaparyniuk again surpasses Yashina, recording a higher win rate of 38.98% compared to Yashina's 33.02%.
• Under pressure, who saves more breakpoints? Yashina seems more reliable, saving 53.38% of breakpoints in contrast to Zaparyniuk's 33.33%.
• All-time performance overview shows Yashina has a win rate of 43.75%, whereas Zaparyniuk's win rate stands at 31.58% over the past year.
• Which surface is favored by each player? Yashina excels indoors on hard courts, with a win rate of 57%, while Zaparyniuk shows a preference for clay courts, achieving a 48% win rate there.
• Considering player levels, Yashina competes mostly in Challengers/ITF > $10K, boasting a 43.24% win rate, slightly above Zaparyniuk's 41.67% at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level.
• Who faces stronger opponents? Zaparyniuk, facing competitors with an average rank of 262.37 compared to Yashina's 410.17.
• In deciding set scenarios, does one player have an edge? Yes, Yashina wins 40% of deciding sets, double that of Zaparyniuk's 20%.
• For breakpoint conversions, who is more successful? Zaparyniuk excels by converting 48.72% of breakpoints compared to Yashina's 35.98%.

Editorial Prediction (August 25, 2025, UTC):

Examining the various strengths and weaknesses of Yashina and Zaparyniuk reveals intriguing distinctions. Yashina's strength lies in a superior second serve performance and breakpoint defense, critical factors that often determine match outcomes. Despite this, Yashina is outperformed by Zaparyniuk in return games, where Zaparyniuk also excels in breakpoint conversions.

The head-to-head comparison shows Yashina maintains a better overall match win rate over the past year. However, Zaparyniuk often competes against stronger opponents, potentially indicating a challenging competitive environment. Yashina also shows superior consistency in deciding sets, which could be pivotal in tightly-contested matches.

Both players have contrasting surface preferences, with Yashina favoring indoor hard courts and Zaparyniuk comfortable on clay. As the match is likely not on Yashina's least favored grass surface, these factors suggest a supportive environment for Yashina's strengths.

Taking into account the comprehensive analysis, Yashina emerges as the likely favorite due to her resilient breakpoint resilience, preferred surface play, and superior overall match consistency.